• After analyzing The Chicken and Tômatsu Shômei’s Beer Bottle after the Atomic Bomb Explosion, use a similar process of observation and discussion to analyze graphs. How can readers interpret graphic information? What makes a graph accurate or misleading?

  As a class, look at many different types of graphs. Discuss the differences and your observations. What might make a graph misleading? How might you change a misleading graph to make it accurate?

It’s important for students to be able to use critical thinking, observation, and reasoning skills when observing different displays of data in the classroom. This is applicable to both mathematics and science. Students must be able to identify advantages and limitations of models and graphs such as size, scale, properties, and materials. They also need to practice the ability to move past assumptions and bias when looking at a misleading graph as well as comparing and contrasting two similar data sets that are in essence very different.

• Describe the painting. Be sure to notice color, brushstroke and composition. What do you think the subject matter is? Use evidence from the painting to backup your answer.
• This work of art is titled The Chicken. Were you able to identify the animal as a chicken? What characteristic of chicken that you already knew are present in the painting?
• How would you describe the mood of this work? What elements in the work add to the mood?
• Could the word “jarring” be used to describe the tone of this work? Explain your answer. What other words could be used to describe the tone of this work?
• How does the artist create motion in the work of art? Do you get the sense that the chicken is moving or still? Explain your answer using elements from the painting.
• Describe what atmosphere the thick brushstrokes add to the painting? How would this work be different in the artist used tiny, precise brushstrokes to create a more realistic version of a chicken?
• Consider the background. How does it relate to the chicken? How does the abstracted background add a sense of mystery to the work?
• Does the placement of the chicken remind you of anything? Why do you think t
• How would this work be different if you could make out what was in the background? What if the composition was not as cropped?

• Did you expect the mood of this work to contain more anxiety?
• Consider that artists make very conscious choices. What theory could you make about why the background is blue? What associations do we have with the color blue?
• Some would say that the colors in the painting are jarring. Do you agree? Why or why not?
• The artist, Chaim Soutine, grew up in a Jewish household where food was scare but still an important part of their traditional religious rituals. How does knowing about this relationship with food in Soutine’s childhood change how we talk about this work?
• This work could be viewed as a celebration of roles of food in society and in Soutine’s own life as both nourishment and a symbol of culture. Do you agree with this statement? Justify your answer using elements from the painting.
• What you know about the world in the early 1900s that could affect our interpretation of The Chicken?

Amongst smeared brushstrokes of dark organic hues, the bright body of a fowl emerges in this painting by artist Chaïm Soutine. Dangling from its right ankle, the bird’s body is splayed, each limb being pulled down by its own weight. Thick, overlapping strokes relay the frenzy of the bird’s vigorous movement. While at first glance it seems as if the chicken is struggling against death, Soutine's painting is a celebration of the animal and flesh, a theme that allowed him to explore his obsessions with life and death.

 

Soutine was highly influenced by the works of the Old Masters and focused his attention on still-lifes, in particular those with carcasses of beef and poultry. Using thick, layered, frantic brushstrokes and a mix of dark and bright colors, Soutine’s depictions of life, death, and decay are brooding and whimsically visceral reflections of life’s struggles and the horrors of war. His application of paint and choice of subject matter bridged the gap between more traditional methods and the developing Abstract Expressionism.

 

This dead creature, a provider of life, is a bloody lump that is rendered fascinatingly beautiful by Soutine's brutal, swirling, painterly brushstrokes. His ferocious brushstrokes appear as if he is attacking the canvas with his paintbrush. This forceful style of painting heightens the sense of drama and spectacle. His Expressionist style coupled with his palette of seemingly jarring and garish colors was unique in Paris at the time he was working.

 

Soutine, who was raised in a Jewish household in Lithuania, struggled with poverty and hunger from childhood into early adulthood when he lived quite meagerly as a student in Paris during WWI. Food within Jewish culture plays an important role in both secular and religious rituals. Reflecting this, his paintings become a celebration and exploration of food in a more universal sense. While the chicken struggles against life and death, the artist also explores the chicken as nourishment and a source of food. Soutine places worth on the chicken through his choice to paint the chicken on a large scale. He also emphasizes the chicken through the close cropping of the composition and the hazy, nondescript background. While the abstraction of the chicken’s image prevents a life-like image of the foul, the motion and emotion crafted through color and brushstroke honors the roles of food in society and in Soutine’s own life as both nourishment and a symbol of culture.

 

Considering his childhood shortage of food, this painting is a celebration of someone finally able to afford luxuries like meat on a regular basis. Despite the abstract nature of this work, the artist was able to afford to purchase meat so that he could paint from real-life. The artist would hang up a piece of meat in his studio and, regardless of the annoyance of his neighbors and its attraction of flies, would leave the meat on the wall as he studied and painted it. His obsessions with life and death allowed him to slowly observe and record the decaying meat while celebrating it through paint.